Comment by [deleted] on 30/11/2024 at 14:06 UTC

2 upvotes, 1 direct replies (showing 1)

View submission: The Business-School Scandal That Just Keeps Getting Bigger

View parent comment

[deleted]

Replies

Comment by SomeGuyCommentin at 30/11/2024 at 14:36 UTC*

1 upvotes, 0 direct replies

That kind of thing is only so complex if you are really worried about being "unfair" to the rich;

First give a reasonable annual free ammount for unconventional income, including loans i.e. so normal people dont have to worry about their small time investments, the value increase of their home or what they win on poker night at the bar.

Any directly gained assents are just taxed by their worth at the time, so if the CEO is paid in shares they still pay taxes like anybody else. There are no deductions for value lost but more taxes on the increase in value each month, these people pride themselfes on being risk takers, let them have some more risk.

Loans above the free ammount taxed like income, you can deduct accordingly, when you pay back the loan.