101 upvotes, 3 direct replies (showing 3)
Specifically, here's what they did:
Russo’s goal was wider than justice for the victim. He wanted to help them recover from their assault.
If you think that's standard everywhere, why are there still so many untested rape kits in Texas[1]?
Comment by what_pd at 27/12/2022 at 00:50 UTC
46 upvotes, 2 direct replies
Yeah those things are best practice. If you're doing something different with a traumatized witness or victim for any type of investigation, you're doing it wrong.
And like the other guy said; police don't test rape kits.
Comment by TwelfthCycle at 27/12/2022 at 16:15 UTC
9 upvotes, 1 direct replies
Definitely what's taught in every class I've been to.
As to untested rape kits? Because money and facilities? Doesn't have a thing to do with "What they did."
Comment by sup3riorw0n at 26/12/2022 at 23:49 UTC
33 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Police Depts don’t test rape kits. Private labs that are contracted by the state do. And like any other govt contractor, labs with that lowest bid win the contract- not the best. And, how many labs like that do you think there are in TX? 2? 20? 200? In a state of roughly 30 million with few hundred thousand violent crimes each year, that many labs isn’t nearly enough. And, these labs aren’t immune to labor shortages either. And, it still costs money from the individual Dept.
So you have a perfect storm (a bad storm) of sorts — where you have a few labs, poorly equipped, poorly staffed, processing lab work for hundreds of thousands of crimes.