-7 upvotes, 1 direct replies (showing 1)
Why? They are a witness, their testimony is evidence. Prior to forensics, witness evidence was often all we had.
Comment by Individual_Put_3214 at 26/12/2022 at 20:24 UTC
17 upvotes, 1 direct replies
Because blindly believing one person over another isn't justice - we had that and it resulted in Emmit Till, our race history makes solely victim testimony a very very very bad idea in a lot of places in this country. But even putting that aside, just choosing to believe one party over another because one of them called you up first is crazy.
​
We also used to shit outside in holes, but then we made a better way. Appealing to victim testimonies historical weight is a poor argument for why it should be enough to convict.