61 upvotes, 1 direct replies (showing 1)
Such a backhanded article. It’s almost like the author *wants* to sharply criticize police but stops just short. So many of the typical anti-police buzzwords and rhetoric and loaded language. This author *wants* to believe the police are failing and need change.
The reality is his whole strategy is slightly different interviews and not just immediately giving up on a case. It’s not groundbreaking it’s common sense, and those types of interview strategies *are* commonly used everywhere I’ve been. How to interview a rape victim 101.
Comment by Pretz_ at 26/12/2022 at 16:58 UTC
25 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Author probably doesn't care. People pay big money for anti-police narratives and buzzwords in ad clicks and subscriptions. Certain foreign governments alone invest big bucks in stoking these fires and artificially inflate viewer rates. It's even money that all the buzzwords were added after the fact by an editor.