created by tachiKC on 10/03/2025 at 18:12 UTC
75 upvotes, 13 top-level comments (showing 13)
Comment by Fantastic_Fox4948 at 10/03/2025 at 18:17 UTC
1 upvotes, 1 direct replies
Nebraska. Making damn sure it’s not for everyone.
Comment by Blitzsturm at 10/03/2025 at 19:13 UTC
1 upvotes, 2 direct replies
This will be interesting to watch for two major reasons:
If this passes it's more of an indication that we've fully transitioned from a democracy to an oligarchy. Only the powerful and the gullible wield real power.
Comment by LumemSlinger at 10/03/2025 at 19:23 UTC
1 upvotes, 2 direct replies
It's funny how the same Nebraska Christian Nationalist legislators who say they are for "winner takes all" are violently opposed to it when applied nationally and consistently.
Comment by JJengland at 10/03/2025 at 18:23 UTC
1 upvotes, 0 direct replies
This horseshit plus hearing they are going after hemp AGAIN, is so god damn infuriating.
Comment by sleepiestOracle at 10/03/2025 at 18:25 UTC
1 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Bought and paid for by pete ricketts super PAC
Comment by No_Conflict3188 at 10/03/2025 at 18:58 UTC
1 upvotes, 1 direct replies
Considering they are also making it difficult for rural voters by requiring in person voting, they may be sorry by this action one day when blue is a larger percentage.
Comment by signalsgt71 at 10/03/2025 at 19:52 UTC
1 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Still should be a ballot measure
Comment by homesweethome2020 at 10/03/2025 at 18:25 UTC
1 upvotes, 0 direct replies
I’m all for winner take all but fair is fair. What this committee is attempting is to limit voters who don’t vote for Republicans. If they really want winner take all they would advance legislation to drop the electoral college and make it a true one vote winner take all. They won’t because they know their policies are unpopular and they wouldn’t win elections.
Comment by Practical-Garbage258 at 10/03/2025 at 19:08 UTC
1 upvotes, 1 direct replies
Jane Kleeb just fell to her knees near her iPhone. Since this is the only thing she fights for in this state.
Comment by asbestoswasframed at 10/03/2025 at 20:04 UTC
1 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Taxation to subsidize corporate ag interests - now with even less representation!
Comment by Old_Abbreviations_92 at 10/03/2025 at 20:51 UTC
1 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Would it be funny if that backfires on the GOP and all the votes goto the Dems in the next election. One can only hope.
Comment by Pamsreddit1 at 10/03/2025 at 20:32 UTC
1 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Of fuckin course it does….
Comment by magikarpRULES56 at 10/03/2025 at 19:25 UTC
1 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Is there a statistic around the % of people in NE who prefer the unicameral system? I would imagine it’s a significant majority, and if they passed this it would be against most people’s wishes.
