-3 upvotes, 1 direct replies (showing 1)
View submission: "A Man Who Reads" from starbreaker.org
I've seen some numbers like that, and they always seem to be a relatively minor gap that might be better explained by other factors.
I think your explanation of the post makes sense, but maybe this is an answer to a question I just missed. Who is he raging against? Who is saying we shouldn't be reading diverse authors? Is this a response to Tate-bros or something?
I get the vibe that maybe he does enjoy reading diverse perspectives but feels the need to claim it's "just what he wants to do" because he doesn't want to admit it, just like saying "I read it for the articles" instead of admitting to looking at naked ladies. That's why he included that but, to lampshade what he's doing, right? Wasn't that the joke?
I would rather just be authentic in saying I like books, and it's ok to read for pleasure and escapism or for broadening my horizons.
Comment by DJBlay at 02/03/2025 at 15:46 UTC
3 upvotes, 0 direct replies
I think there definitely is some internal bias here because I think it’s quite the stretch–the argument or thought that you had regarding privilege.
It’s not even a topic that’s mentioned and you wanted to bring it up? But why? Can we allow the author to express their delight in being able to find amazing literary journeys regardless of the source?
Maybe that’s a privilege, but is it worth mentioning and trying to shine a dark light on something that doesn’t need it?
Like smile, and be happy? Is this where the hard work needs to be done?
I get the vibe that there is a hunt for something in between the words. I’m not sure what you’re looking for. But when I approach this with good faith I feel grateful for the opportunity this man had and I hope this can proliferate.