created by Cowlip1 on 31/01/2025 at 16:30 UTC
20 upvotes, 2 top-level comments (showing 2)
Comment by Cowlip1 at 31/01/2025 at 16:32 UTC
17 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Isn't this lovely to hear... But it all makes sense now.
The report says Alberta’s regulatory colleges did not appear to conduct internal reviews of studies and data. Rather, the report authors said colleges followed directives from Alberta’s chief medical officer of health.
Solutions to the virus were limited due to threats and disciplinary actions against health professionals, leading to a “narrow band of COVID-19 responses acceptable to health regulators,” the authors said
I want elections for these chief medical officer of health people... Or get rid of their power and positions altogether.
Comment by AutoModerator at 31/01/2025 at 16:30 UTC
1 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Thanks for your submission. New posts are pre-screened by the moderation team before being listed. Posts which do not meet our high standards will not be approved - please see our posting guidelines[1]. It may take a number of hours before this post is reviewed, depending on mod availability and the complexity of the post (eg. video content takes more time for us to review).
1: https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/wiki/index
In the meantime, you may like to make edits to your post so that it is more likely to be approved (for example, adding reliable source links for any claims). If there are problems with the title of your post, it is best you delete it and re-submit with an improved title.