Comment by Silver0ptics on 03/02/2025 at 15:42 UTC

-9 upvotes, 2 direct replies (showing 2)

View submission: Fear mongering Posts

View parent comment

I mean thats a verifiable lie but you do you, its not like your fellow democrat will hold you accountable.

Replies

Comment by [deleted] at 03/02/2025 at 16:21 UTC

5 upvotes, 1 direct replies

Okay, verify the lie then. I'll wait.

Comment by Phaustiantheodicy at 03/02/2025 at 17:09 UTC

7 upvotes, 0 direct replies

Let’s consider a thought experiment:

Imagine that one day you wake up in a body of the opposite sex. Would you still identify with your original gender, or would you align with the gender typically associated with your new body?

• **Option A: You identify with your original gender.** This implies that gender is not strictly tied to biological sex, since your sense of self remains independent of the physical body.
• **Option B: You identify with the gender associated with your new body.** This suggests that gender identity can shift based on bodily experience, which aligns with the idea of gender fluidity.

Now, if someone rejects this analogy by arguing that it is unscientific or irrelevant, consider this: **intersex individuals exist**—people who are born with both male and female biological traits. This shows that nature itself does not always rigidly separate people into one of two binary categories.

Thus, the analogy is not only logically sound but also grounded in real-world biological and social phenomena.