created by Snark_Knight_29 on 30/01/2025 at 02:45 UTC
24 upvotes, 4 top-level comments (showing 4)
I always see the toofers say things like “why did they say American 11 was still flying an hour after it crashed? Checkmate sheep!” The attack caught everyone with their pants down, no one knew what was next, and half the time the military and FAA was getting information the same way the world was- through horrified reporters, getting word from eyewitnesses. With the benefit of hindsight of course it’s a clear plot, but the day of? It was fast paced, over before schools were even having lunch. The workday was barely a quarter way through by the time the North Tower collapsed. It was sheer pandemonium, of course there’d be miscommunications, false reports, duplicate reports. It’s human nature, especially something as massive as 9/11.
Comment by GhostRider1945 at 30/01/2025 at 05:29 UTC
8 upvotes, 0 direct replies
I'm pretty sure they though American 11 was American 77 at one point
Comment by bearhorn6 at 30/01/2025 at 08:48 UTC
6 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Yea I was born after the attacks and grew up with it as common knowledge. I’ve recently sat and watched news broadcasts to try and experience it in real time for this reason. The ATC/FAA audios are so scary/telling. No one knows which planes are missing or crashed they were chasing11 for a while, they assumed the first plane would be landing until it didn’t, assumed it was an accident etc. Like it’s so ducking stupid to act like it was a clear cut event
Comment by Moakmeister at 30/01/2025 at 14:47 UTC
6 upvotes, 1 direct replies
I love when they bring up how the BBC mistakenly reported that 7 WTC collapsed an hour before it actually collapsed. Like it's utterly undeniable proof that 7 was brought down with explosives.
The great thing about the 9/11 truthers is that their theories always require way too many completely random groups of people to be in on it, rendering them impossible. Like, the BBC, the *British Broadcasting Corporation,* was actually part of the inside job of the fake terrorist attacks. The CIA or whoever actually told these reporters that they were gonna blow up the twin towers, the Pentagon, and 7 WTC... because? In what possible way would that help the attacks succeed? Like "hey guys, I think this'll work, but let's tell a television network what we're doing. They're totally not gonna immediately blow the whistle on us, they're not gonna say anything."
"Why the hell would we do that? How can they help us?"
"Because when we bring down 7 WTC, they can report on it!"
"...Why would they need to know about it in advance in order to report on it? Like wouldn't they just report on it when it happens anyway? And why are we telling the BBC and no one else? Why not also tell Fox and CNN?"
"NO! We have to ONLY tell the BBC!"
Comment by EconomistSea9498 at 30/01/2025 at 12:59 UTC
4 upvotes, 1 direct replies
Shit like this annoys the piss out of me because no, the sad fuckin reality is: humans are easily confused, it was an incredibly high stress situation with cataclysmic losses of life happening that even if everything WAS planned and it was ALL some big the gov/jews did 9/11 bs... there still probably would be hundreds if not thousands of miscommunications happening that day, just because tens of thousands(hell, millions watching) of people are trying to figure out what the Reese's peanut butter fuck is going on.
Sometimes, usually way more often than a planned domestic terrorist attack on the city of New York, people are just not perfect at their jobs.