54 upvotes, 4 direct replies (showing 4)
View submission: Massive firings and “retirements”
Ok, I'm making an executive decision that I think your post can stay up.
Transparency: from what I can tell, the sub has never really implemented rules about sources previously. I think its unfair to start now without a thread on the topic and some feedback from users.
Don't be surprised if in the future we may discuss not allowing posts without some sort of verifiable source.
All the best! Be well.
Comment by Brilliant_War4087 at 01/02/2025 at 03:23 UTC
27 upvotes, 2 direct replies
If you make the rule because of this user, it has to be called the nomad_moose rule.
Comment by Character_Lead_4140 at 01/02/2025 at 02:08 UTC
10 upvotes, 1 direct replies
Cool mod!
Comment by DonutComfortable1855 at 02/02/2025 at 15:47 UTC
2 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Heard the same yesterday from a long-term employee who seems to avoided this first round.
Comment by SpringFront4180 at 01/02/2025 at 14:28 UTC
1 upvotes, 2 direct replies
Has there been a verifiable news source backup this statement yet?
I’ve seen multiple sources report that six people have been affected, but where is the published source backing the claim that 9,300+ people are affected?
Is Reddit cool with unsubstantiated claims?