Comment by TheMadRatter21 on 26/04/2024 at 08:59 UTC

2 upvotes, 3 direct replies (showing 3)

View submission: the update regarding EOD edition

View parent comment

No, it shouldn't, and base game owners didn't pay the $150 to support the development of it, and they still need the revenue, you are incorrect. the only ones affected right now are EOD player specifically.

Replies

Comment by Raptawrking at 26/04/2024 at 09:32 UTC

3 upvotes, 1 direct replies

If it wasn't $250 to get it, and instead was either in base edition or a separate purchase, bsg could reach crowds who don't want the hard-core pve and easily make more money

Comment by DJMixwell at 26/04/2024 at 16:04 UTC

2 upvotes, 1 direct replies

The game isn’t even finished yet. Standard accounts paid to support the development of the game as much as anyone else. We *all* paid to fund development of and receive the full 1.0 release. EOD players paid an extra $100 to get all *future* content for free as well. The future content shouldn’t come until after the finished game is released. Anything developed in early access, using funds raised from any tier, should be for the base 1.0 release. They should not be using early access funds to develop additional paid content when they haven’t even delivered what we paid for initially.

We’re *all* getting screwed out of content we paid for.

Comment by TheRealStandard at 26/04/2024 at 09:36 UTC*

2 upvotes, 1 direct replies

An offline mode shouldn't be DLC in the first place, it should just be a normal gamemode.

DLC should have been friggin cosmetics or something.