created by Gurdus4 on 28/01/2025 at 22:23 UTC
0 upvotes, 6 top-level comments (showing 6)
Comment by Gurdus4 at 28/01/2025 at 22:25 UTC
3 upvotes, 1 direct replies
By stoodies, I mean more specifically, **retrospective database analyses**
Comment by Bubudel at 29/01/2025 at 12:39 UTC
5 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Something that ''stooodieees'' cannot do is take you inside someone's body in a clinic to assess their condition hands on in detail
Spoken like someone who doesn't understand medical science in the slightest.
Yes, we should order preemptive autopsies for every subject in a study. Brilliant.
Comment by sexy-egg-1991 at 30/01/2025 at 01:41 UTC
1 upvotes, 0 direct replies
This isn't a good argument dude. They're proven liars .that's all I need
Comment by Thormidable at 29/01/2025 at 08:29 UTC
-1 upvotes, 2 direct replies
The body is too complex to trace exact most causes and effects. It's why the vast majority of medical studies tend to be statistical. Because that is the surest way to get good quality data.
That's why the vaccinated are reassured that we died at half the rate of the unvaccinated during the pandemic.
Thank God you aren't running medical research.
Comment by Sea_Association_5277 at 28/01/2025 at 23:50 UTC
0 upvotes, 1 direct replies
A) that would violate ethics since you would need consent from hundreds of thousands of people and that's just not feasible.
B) This introduces far too many variables. How does one know it wasn't the procedure itself that caused the observed effect?
It's B that really shows how utterly uneducated antivaxers are in research development.
Comment by Impfgegnergegner at 29/01/2025 at 09:38 UTC
1 upvotes, 1 direct replies
So a guy who does (retracted) mouse studies goes into somebody`s body?