10 upvotes, 1 direct replies (showing 1)
View submission: CCIP - 029 Dynamic Karma Cap
The only reason I'm considering not voting for this, is because I would prefer the 15K cap to become 0.01% of the distribution.
It's dynamic, follows a percentage and not a set number, and follows the progression of distributions.
More importantly, it doesn't automatically cap people, even if they had a low distribution. If the top users didn't earn much, they don't get capped.
With OP's proposal, my issue is top users are always capped, even if they didn't earn much.
​
With that said, I'm not completely against the proposal, because I think in most realistic cases, the result will probably be almost the same, as OP proved with the data. So I'm a little bit on the fence.
Comment by [deleted] at 14/04/2022 at 09:18 UTC
1 upvotes, 1 direct replies
[removed]