The United Republic of the Federation of the Pacific in 2032

https://i.redd.it/0g9gs3blzsge1.png

created by North-Scar6638 on 03/02/2025 at 02:38 UTC

106 upvotes, 27 top-level comments (showing 25)

Comments

Comment by SEA2COLA at 03/02/2025 at 02:51 UTC

66 upvotes, 0 direct replies

I am firmly of the belief that if the PNW were to become independent we would adopt only the name Cascadia. No 'Republic', no 'Democratic' no other labels or abbreviations. Just 'Cascadia'. Reason? We've always resisted labels....

Comment by ufnope at 03/02/2025 at 03:13 UTC

17 upvotes, 4 direct replies

Can Colorado come?

Comment by tj1007 at 03/02/2025 at 03:54 UTC

12 upvotes, 0 direct replies

Arizona checking in.

I know we’re not normally included in this, but yes please, take us with you.

Our 2022 elections show Hope.

We need to break away from climate change deniers as our heat becomes more extreme and from people give away our water rights to foreign countries.

Comment by SecretAgentVampire at 03/02/2025 at 02:45 UTC

41 upvotes, 6 direct replies

Idaho and Utah are extremely conservative right-wing states. What in God's name do you think would make them want to ally with the far west coast? You have a nice time in Salt Lake City (which is 2/3rds owned by the LDS) or something?

Ridiculous.

Comment by KeystoneJesus at 03/02/2025 at 02:50 UTC

10 upvotes, 1 direct replies

What the fuck are “Dixieland” and “New Afrika”

Comment by Kroptokinsloaf at 03/02/2025 at 02:40 UTC

10 upvotes, 1 direct replies

I prefer the Cascadian Confederacy of independent systems. Roger Roger!

Comment by KindredWoozle at 03/02/2025 at 04:59 UTC

3 upvotes, 1 direct replies

It doesn't hurt to dream big.

However, it's unlikely that the Canadians and Mexicans living within those areas that are currently Canada and Mexico will agree.

Comment by Ki-Wi-Hi at 03/02/2025 at 05:30 UTC

3 upvotes, 0 direct replies

Oregonians would never choose to be called Californian.

Comment by TulsiTsunami at 03/02/2025 at 03:20 UTC

2 upvotes, 0 direct replies

I prefer the BIOREGION, based on watershed

Comment by f00tst1nk3 at 03/02/2025 at 03:26 UTC

2 upvotes, 3 direct replies

Why Idaho

Comment by Welsh_Pirate at 03/02/2025 at 02:49 UTC

2 upvotes, 0 direct replies

If I've learned one thing from bio-regionalism it's that borders that are straight lines are a bad sign.

Comment by snowcone23 at 03/02/2025 at 04:24 UTC

2 upvotes, 0 direct replies

Utah isn’t invited

Comment by xraynorx at 03/02/2025 at 07:50 UTC

2 upvotes, 0 direct replies

Nope. I don’t like this one little bit. We are Cascadia.

Comment by bernyzilla at 03/02/2025 at 03:00 UTC

2 upvotes, 0 direct replies

Interesting map. I could be okay with Southern California and part of Mexico, but I would not be interested in including Idaho Utah or Arizona.

Also this is missing Alaska, which is way more important

Comment by Puzzleheaded_Mix7873 at 03/02/2025 at 03:00 UTC

3 upvotes, 3 direct replies

Utah, Idaho and Arizona are extremely right-wing. I wouldn’t want them as part of Cascadia, because I don’t think they would align with the values which is the whole purpose.

Comment by Browncoatinabox at 03/02/2025 at 03:06 UTC

1 upvotes, 1 direct replies

If we are pushing east for Idaho and Utah can we add Wyoming?

Comment by -LordKromdar- at 03/02/2025 at 04:23 UTC

1 upvotes, 0 direct replies

I see Oregon will adopt the Ukrainian flag and stamp a beaver on it.

Also, what happened to Lake Michigan?

Comment by russellmzauner at 03/02/2025 at 05:17 UTC

1 upvotes, 0 direct replies

They have Alvarado where the State of Jeff would be (along with part of Southern OR).

Assuming Utah would join someone else's project is assuming a LOT https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State%5C_of%5C_Deseret[1][2]

1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State%5C_of%5C_Deseret

2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_Deseret

Including parts of Mexico and Texas in this way is really way off the mark, especially leaving out Montana.

Washington literally all but said they're gonna try to establish good relations with Montana and Texas and I agree - trying to reach over the fence to ANYONE who wants to make an honest effort/attempt to work together to make things better for everyone is something I will always support; it's not a waste of time unless the representatives working on the project make it that way.

I think I made a remark somewhere else - this map is uninformed and mostly noise in the signal/dissonance.

It's not a very good prediction or scenario; more like someone's projection of how they see the world instead of examining the parts and seeing how they want to fit together.

Comment by Grizlybird at 03/02/2025 at 05:46 UTC

1 upvotes, 0 direct replies

That Oregon flag is sick.

Comment by jspook at 03/02/2025 at 06:39 UTC

1 upvotes, 0 direct replies

Why did Washington get changed to Lower Columbia?

Comment by Slotter-that-Kid at 03/02/2025 at 14:42 UTC

1 upvotes, 0 direct replies

Idaho and utah? The single most racist state outside of the south and religious zealots are not what make for a good society.

Comment by hanimal16 at 03/02/2025 at 15:29 UTC

1 upvotes, 0 direct replies

The name is awful. Just Cascadia would be fine.

Don’t need to be the United republic federation of anything. Just Cascadia.

Comment by knundrum at 03/02/2025 at 17:13 UTC

1 upvotes, 0 direct replies

Born in Idaho. You don't want them, trust me

Comment by basementthought at 03/02/2025 at 17:47 UTC

1 upvotes, 0 direct replies

I'd give that single-party government a miss

Comment by ScumCrew at 03/02/2025 at 17:57 UTC

1 upvotes, 0 direct replies

No love for Colorado?