Monthly Scientific Discussion Thread - December 2024

https://www.reddit.com/r/COVID19/comments/1h42rpe/monthly_scientific_discussion_thread_december_2024/

created by AutoModerator on 01/12/2024 at 13:00 UTC

11 upvotes, 4 top-level comments (showing 4)

This monthly thread is for scientific discussion pertaining to COVID-19. Please post questions about the science of this virus and disease here to collect them for others and clear up post space for research articles.

A short reminder about our rules: Speculation about medical treatments and questions about medical or travel advice will have to be removed and referred to official guidance as we do not and cannot guarantee that all information in this thread is correct.

We ask for top level answers in this thread to be appropriately sourced using primarily peer-reviewed articles and government agency releases, both to be able to verify the postulated information, and to facilitate further reading.

Please only respond to questions that you are comfortable in answering without having to involve guessing or speculation. Answers that strongly misinterpret the quoted articles might be removed and repeated offenses might result in muting a user.

If you have any suggestions or feedback, please send us a modmail[1], we highly appreciate it.

1: https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=/r/covid19

Please keep questions focused on the science. Stay curious!

Comments

Comment by AutoModerator at 01/12/2024 at 13:00 UTC

1 upvotes, 1 direct replies

Keep in mind this is a *science* sub. Cite your sources appropriately (No news sources, no Twitter, no Youtube). No politics/economics/low effort comments (jokes, ELI5, etc.)/anecdotal discussion (personal stories/info). Please read our full ruleset[1] carefully before commenting/posting.

1: https://www.reddit.com/r/COVID19/about/rules/

2: /message/compose/?to=/r/COVID19

Comment by AcornAl at 04/12/2024 at 11:39 UTC

7 upvotes, 1 direct replies

A small non-conclusive piece of the origin puzzle

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-03968-0[1][2]

1: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-03968-0

2: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-03968-0

They found evidence that suggests humans, raccoon dogs and greater hog badgers from the market were likely infected. aka sick with something that may or may not have been covid. They hope to see if they can discover unique fingerprints from these infection markers to potentially suggest what type of virus may have caused these infections.

The non-peer reviewed results were presented in the *Preparing for the Next Pandemic: Evolution, Pathogenesis and Virology of Coronaviruses* conference, in Awaji, Japan, on 3 December.

Comment by Boring-Philosophy-46 at 23/12/2024 at 19:25 UTC

2 upvotes, 0 direct replies

https://research.umcutrecht.nl/news/dutch-study-covid-19-vaccinations-do-not-explain-excess-mortality-during-the-pandemic/

Maybe someone wants to make a post, idk, I won't. I came across this one.

Comment by poormrblue at 02/12/2024 at 17:45 UTC*

1 upvotes, 1 direct replies

This feels like a bit of a trite question, but I'm curious, in any case.

Early on in the pandemic, there was some focus on vaccines effectiveness to prevent transmission altogether. As the virus developed, the focus on this seemed to go by the wayside in favor of studying the effectiveness in lessening case severity.

Obviously vaccines shouldn't be expected to prevent infection, and it makes sense for various reasons to focus rather on vaccines effectiveness in mitigating the worst outcomes of an infection.

But I'm merely curious if the vaccines, in limited, short term exposure situations, are effective in preventing infection. Have there been any recent (past year or two) studies regarding this, or is there any information at all out there in regards to more recent vaccines and variants?