Comment by florinandrei on 24/01/2025 at 15:36 UTC

118 upvotes, 3 direct replies (showing 3)

View submission: "Excluding Indians": Trump admin questions Native Americans' birthright citizenship in court

View parent comment

It's not nonsensical if it's driven by an agenda.

Replies

Comment by redballooon at 24/01/2025 at 18:28 UTC

58 upvotes, 0 direct replies

Which idealizes the human rights situation from 1650

Comment by wikimandia at 24/01/2025 at 16:18 UTC

37 upvotes, 0 direct replies

Agendas can be nonsense when they’re not based on any kind of underlying values, but populist ignorance. Thus his “two genders” executive order that technically made everyone women.

Comment by carterartist at 24/01/2025 at 18:00 UTC

9 upvotes, 0 direct replies

Transitive property, if the agenda is nonsensical therefore it’s still nonsensical