Comment by 0002millertime on 24/01/2025 at 14:28 UTC*

705 upvotes, 5 direct replies (showing 5)

View submission: "Excluding Indians": Trump admin questions Native Americans' birthright citizenship in court

View parent comment

In any case, the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924 made all Native Americans US citizens. Arguing about a much earlier law is nonsensical.

Replies

Comment by carterartist at 24/01/2025 at 14:42 UTC

521 upvotes, 2 direct replies

It’s MAGA, everything they do is nonsensical

Comment by sezit at 24/01/2025 at 16:56 UTC

17 upvotes, 0 direct replies

That doesn't mean that far right judges and the Supreme Court loonies won't find some way to justify it.

They don't have to make sense, or even be factual, and what's more - they have proved it.

Comment by John-Mandeville at 24/01/2025 at 14:34 UTC

60 upvotes, 2 direct replies

The (IMO, specious) legal argument is that, if the 14th Amendment indeed excluded Native Americans--evidenced by that 1924 law as well as the Civil Rights Act of 1866--then its language ("All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside") can't be read literally, and instead needs to be read with the intent of the drafters in mind. The goal is to exclude children of foreign nationals born in the U.S. from citizenship, not Native Americans.

Comment by robocalypse at 24/01/2025 at 16:32 UTC

13 upvotes, 1 direct replies

The Supreme Court as all about "Originalism" these days. This is basically how they have been arguing most of the heinous decisions in the Robert's court.

Comment by chillinewman at 24/01/2025 at 17:14 UTC

7 upvotes, 0 direct replies

Perfectly sensical and perverse. Criminally corrupt everything to advance your agenda, in the name of the felon in chief.