https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/22/us/white-women-american-slave-trade.html
created by DoremusJessup on 24/11/2024 at 15:50 UTC
2875 upvotes, 17 top-level comments (showing 17)
Comment by [deleted] at 24/11/2024 at 17:42 UTC
108 upvotes, 1 direct replies
[removed]
Comment by Alexios_Makaris at 24/11/2024 at 19:39 UTC
203 upvotes, 4 direct replies
This seems unsurprising? Like basically every group in America other than actual slaves, had some involvement in the slave trade. Certainly some groups had extremely low participation rates in it, but I doubt any group was at 0 member over the ~250 years of legal slavery in North America avoided ever having a member active in the trade of slaves.
Comment by Tessninky01 at 24/11/2024 at 16:26 UTC
263 upvotes, 4 direct replies
I highly recommend the book They Were Her Property by Stephanie Jones-Rogers. It is a detailed and meticulous account of how white women participated in and benefitted from slavery.
Comment by SprawlValkyrie at 24/11/2024 at 20:10 UTC
91 upvotes, 3 direct replies
Conversely, white women were deeply involved in the Abolitionist movement, to the extent that it may not have succeeded without them. One example:
“New England women were particularly effective at organizing and sending anti-slavery petitions to Congress. The Liberator reported that petitions issued by women in New England doubled that of their male counterparts. “In petitioning, women were far more active than men, as evidenced by the vast number of female signatures on antislavery petitions in comparison to their numbers in the antislavery crusade.”
Source: https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/a-great-inheritance-abolitionist-practices-in-the-women-s-rights-movement.htm#:~:text=Along%20with%20anti%2Dslavery%20fairs,organized%20on%20a%20national%20scale[1].
Comment by deathbychips2 at 25/11/2024 at 01:36 UTC*
12 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Yes..
Was this a question before. Women have been present in every part of society all throughout history, even the horrible evil parts and we should stop pretending all women stayed home and knitted until the 1970s.
Comment by JasonWaterfaII at 24/11/2024 at 19:12 UTC
44 upvotes, 1 direct replies
Read Frederick Douglass’s autobiography or Harriet Tubman’s biography or I’m sure many others and you can hear about the active roll of white women in slavery from a primary source.
Comment by hannibal_morgan at 24/11/2024 at 19:39 UTC
53 upvotes, 2 direct replies
Why would this at all be surprising?
Comment by leftguard44 at 25/11/2024 at 00:06 UTC
15 upvotes, 0 direct replies
I’d say there’s a lot of precedence in history that women don’t get as much credit as they deserve, in terms of both achievements and evils
Comment by HauntedButtCheeks at 24/11/2024 at 20:21 UTC
23 upvotes, 0 direct replies
As a white woman, I think this was always obvious. Imo the only reason anyone didn't know this is because white male scholars were invested in perpetuating the historical fantasy of woman playing passive roles in society.
Comment by BigDoinks710 at 24/11/2024 at 22:15 UTC
16 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Yall ever heard of Patty Cannon? Now that was one messed up bitch. She ran a gang that would go and capture free african-americans in the north and then sell them to slavers in the south.
On her Wikipedia page, the first picture you see is a painting of her tossing a black baby into a fire pit...
Comment by saltytarts at 24/11/2024 at 21:45 UTC
5 upvotes, 1 direct replies
Slavery ended in 1865, women got the vote in 1920. Is this touched upon in the book?
Comment by DoremusJessup at 24/11/2024 at 15:51 UTC
3 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Comment by Trix_Are_4_90Kids at 26/11/2024 at 06:03 UTC
1 upvotes, 0 direct replies
of course they were. who thought they weren't?
Comment by Jack-of-Hearts-7 at 26/11/2024 at 19:45 UTC
1 upvotes, 0 direct replies
r/NoShitSherlock
Comment by [deleted] at 24/11/2024 at 19:53 UTC
-1 upvotes, 1 direct replies
[removed]
Comment by [deleted] at 24/11/2024 at 18:19 UTC
-2 upvotes, 1 direct replies
[deleted]
Comment by [deleted] at 24/11/2024 at 20:45 UTC
-14 upvotes, 1 direct replies
[removed]