https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/1fbigqh/wikipedia_deamp_bot/
created by osalbahr on 07/09/2024 at 22:04 UTC*
13 upvotes, 2 top-level comments (showing 2)
Earlier, I was annoyed that a Wikipedia article had AMP url's. I was able to manually use AmputatorBot to successfully make an edit, no manual tweaking needed, for both url's!
So thoughts on using AmputatorBot directly for a Wikipedia bot? I don't want to re-invent the wheel.
Relevant bot request thread on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bot%5C_requests#de-AMP%5C_bot[1][2]
1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bot%5C_requests#de-AMP%5C_bot
2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bot_requests#de-AMP_bot
Edit: looks like someone already started it[3]. I do not know whether they are using AmputatorBot.
3: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bots/Requests_for_approval/DoggoBot_10
Comment by osalbahr at 09/09/2024 at 00:57 UTC
1 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Looks like this is the most upvoted post in the past year. That's cool
Comment by AmputatorBot at 07/09/2024 at 22:04 UTC
0 upvotes, 1 direct replies
It looks like OP posted an AMP link. These should load faster, but AMP is controversial because of concerns over privacy and the Open Web[1].
1: https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot
Maybe check out **the canonical page** instead: **https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bot_requests[2][3]**
2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bot_requests
3: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bot_requests
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
^(I'm a bot | )^(Why & About)[4]^( | )^(Summon: u/AmputatorBot)[5]
4: https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot
5: https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/