Re: A proposal to freeze the Gemini specification

On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 01:12:37AM +0200, almaember wrote:
> I hoped to not have to say it like this, I wanted to hide behind formal 
language and politeness, but I don't care about his opinion at all. He 
owns a website and a capsule, that's all. He didn't write the 
implementations and the capsules. He can do whatever he wants with his 
website, but for the rest, let the community decide. And the community has 
pretty much settled on the original spec, so...
> 
> The difference to other standards is that we have no versions. When the 
C standards committee (which, by the way, has representatives of the major 
implementations), they release a new revision, but don't retroactively 
change anything. That's not possible with Gemini.

The C standard is an ISO standard. Gemini is not. So the comparison
doesn't make sense, especially with the committee comment.

---

Previous in thread (12 of 34): 🗣️ mntn (mntn (a) mntn.xyz)

Next in thread (14 of 34): 🗣️ DJ Chase (u9000 (a) posteo.mx)

View entire thread.