Re: Gemini on Sourcehut (was Re: News----good, bad, ugly? You decide (was Re: [spec] comments on the proposed gemini spec revisions))

Hi,

i'm sad to see Sean go, but i'm also exicted that there are still people 
around who are interested in finalizing the spec.
Maybe when things settled and a few people interested in further discussion
have come to consensus we should reach out to solderpunk 
with a proposal of how things could go on.

That being said, i'd like to throw another suggestion in for discussion:
> Because of this, I have taken the liberty of creating a project and bug
> trackers on Sourcehut. I will be coping the Gitlab issues and
> repositories today.
> 
> => https://sr.ht/~u9000/gemini-specification/ Sourcehut project

Instead of moving to yet another source forge that caused emotional reactions
within the community for multiple times for different reasons, 
we should go for self-hosting.
If there is any interest from the community i'd be happy to provide a gitea
instance especially focused on projects for gemini (not limited to the spec). 
I've been running my own gitea instance for quite some time now [1] and i'm
maintaining geminispace.info, the widely used public search engine for gemini.

Comments highly appreciated. I'd flesh out some more details about my 
ideas if you are interested.

regards
René

[1]: https://src.clttr.info

---

Previous in thread (12 of 28): 🗣️ u9000 (u9000 (a) posteo.net)

Next in thread (14 of 28): 🗣️ Adnan Maolood (me (a) adnano.co)

View entire thread.