Re: [spec] comments on the proposed gemini spec revisions

On Sun Oct 10, 2021 at 11:57 PM PDT, Omar Polo wrote:
>
> Alex // nytpu <alex@nytpu.com> writes:
>
> > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Since I don't have (and am unable to create) a gitlab account, I wrote a
> > Gemlog post detailing my responses to a bunch of the issues on the
> > gitlab repos for Sean Conner's spec revisions.
>
> I can wholeheartedly agree with the gitlab rant. I've never used it
> before and was quite shocked of how bad it is. Even github is "decent"
> in this regard, on a technical level at least. I can at least *read* a
> README, the code or the issues with w3m.
>
> But it's a sailed ship. We can only try to prevent similar moves in the
> future.

Should sourcehut https://sr.ht/ be considered? It is also FOSS, has the
features we are looking for from a git forge, already has a vibrant
Gemini community, and places a much higher priority on supporting
alternative browsers / graceful degradation. I apologize if this was
already discussed originally.

Alex

---

Previous in thread (24 of 50): 🗣️ Pete D. (peteyboy (a) sdf.org)

Next in thread (26 of 50): 🗣️ (stack (a) tilde.club)

View entire thread.