July 28, 2021 4:42 PM, "Omar Polo" <op@omarpolo.com> wrote: > I think this was discussed before, but one of the core point of > text/gemini is the idea of line types: each line has a type and there > aren't inline objects. They weren't asking for inline links (emphasis mine): Rev. Fr. Robert Bower <frrobert@frrobert.com> writes: > -snip- > Would it not be advantageous for content creators for Gemini to support both the standard Gemini > syntax of => for links and also support the []() markdown syntax for links, *limited to links on > their own line?* > -snip- I, for one, think Gemini links are fine just the way they are, but it's food for thought. Just my two cents, Robert "khuxkm" Miles
---
Previous in thread (2 of 12): 🗣️ Omar Polo (op (a) omarpolo.com)