On 14/03/2021 17:27, text@sdfeu.org wrote: > Big fan of Wikis here, thus I think another alternative could be > Wikiversity (a project of the "not-for-profit corporation" > Wikimedia): > > [...] > > The Gemini specification could be published and edited there as > well, with unwanted edits easily reverted, as these should be > concluded upon via discussions first, probably. > > Discussions to specific topics, e. g. response codes, could be > sections in the Discuss tab to the Specification article or even own > discussion pages in case the topic is covered by its own > (sub-)article. According to [1], Wikiversity is intended for *learning resources*, specifically learning resources different from what Wikipedia and Wikibooks offer. I fear that if we were to try to use it as a platform to develop the Gemini specification, rather than just learning materials around Gemini, Wikiversity editors would not accept this. If one were to create such pages on Wikiversity, they would probably be quickly removed using Wikiversity's speedy deletion guideline [2]; the very first criterion listed for speedy deletion is "No educational objectives". [1] https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Mission [2] https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Deletions -- pjvm
---
Previous in thread (15 of 39): 🗣️ Liam (liam (a) lmcm.io)
Next in thread (17 of 39): 🗣️ Stephane Bortzmeyer (stephane (a) sources.org)