Stephane Bortzmeyer <stephane@sources.org> wrote: > Regarding Gitlab, there is not yet (I regret it) a well-known and > widely used decentralized issue tracking system allowing not to have > an account of the central system. (There are many experiments, but > nothing solid yet.) So, it had to be a centralized system. We may > discuss about gitlab vs. gitea and about one given gitlab hoster > vs. another one but I regard this as details. SourceHut[1]'s todo tracker [2] satisfies this exactly, allowing anonymous users (identified simply by their e-mail) to comment on issues, with fine-grained permission control available. Repositories, mailing lists, and issue trackers work independently, can be tied together using integrations, and can be housed under a single name using projects. It's probably too late to migrate to it from GitLab, but I suggest you at least take a look and experiment a bit. It's completely free and open-source software, and anybody can host their own instance. [1]: https://sourcehut.org [2]: https://todo.sr.ht
---
Previous in thread (9 of 39): 🗣️ Stephane Bortzmeyer (stephane (a) sources.org)
Next in thread (11 of 39): 🗣️ Sandra Snan (sandra.snan (a) idiomdrottning.org)