[SPEC] Backwards-compatible metadata in Gemini

On 2021-02-23 14:23, Julien Blanchard wrote:
> I wholeheartedly agree, please stop proposing unnecessary complexity 
that benefits nobody (just for the sake of normalizing everything) or adds 
client display fancyness.
> We should always consider underpowered devices, screen readers, people 
with a slow internet connection. I know TLS is already a burden for some 
of these cases so let?s not add more data to transfer.
> 
> ?
> julienxx
> 

'Nuff said. We need to start focusing on the finer details rather than 
coming up with new ones. Sure, it might be a good idea in your head, but 
at one point or another the spec **will** be frozen.

Sebastian Alejandro | kayw

---

Previous in thread (24 of 99): 🗣️ Julien Blanchard (julien (a) typed-hole.org)

Next in thread (26 of 99): 🗣️ Oliver Simmons (oliversimmo (a) gmail.com)

View entire thread.