Le dimanche 3 janvier 2021, 17:13:10 CET Petite Abeille a ?crit : > > > On Jan 3, 2021, at 17:11, C?me Chilliet <come at chilliet.eu> wrote: > > > > No, the specification specifies that default is utf-8, so unspecified is utf-8. > > Precisely my point. Thanks. No, you said ?Not quite.? when Stephane said UTF-8 had quasi-monopoly, and you rectified ?Unspecified rules?. Unspecified is UTF-8, by specification. So UTF-8 does have a quasi-monopoly. > No one said it was the same. But it would be interesting to know. The fact that you made a difference between unspecified and utf-8 for encoding, and that you provided both tools to detect encoding and language made it seem like you were considering both cases the same, while encoding is always known (unspecified == utf-8) while language is sometimes unknown. I also explicitely pointed this difference to encourage people to specify the language in their Gemini headers, as a lot of Gemini pages currently have an unspecified language. > What's your server? We can validate that promptly. Please stop splitting your answers in several emails like this, it?s uselessly filling the mailing list and making discussions harder to follow. I do not need to validate that, I know that my server header does not contain a charset tag. C?me
---
Previous in thread (28 of 29): 🗣️ Petite Abeille (petite.abeille (a) gmail.com)