[spec] Oustanding issues

• 🗣️ From: John Cowan (cowan (a) ccil.org)
• 📅 Sent: 2020-12-27 19:35
• 📧 Message 10 of 31

On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 6:23 AM Solderpunk <solderpunk at posteo.net> wrote:


> * The spec is a bit vague on under which circumstances the META part of
>   a response header may be empty, and on exactly what that means (e.g.
>   is a tab after the status code still required in any case?).  This
>   needs to be tightened up, and I'm pretty sure this should be done by
>   just making non-empty META a requirement.
>

If empty META strings are going to be invalid (I think they should be),
then the last graf of 3.3 should be deleted.



	
There's been a request for recommendations on logging of queries.  I

>   think this is out of scope for the itself, but an entirely
>   appropriate thing to mention in either the Best Practices document or
>   a separate companion standard for standard logging format.
>

I'll address that in a separate thread.  I'm also going to talk about i18n
issues (other than IRIs) in a separate thread.


John Cowan          http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan        cowan at ccil.org
A rose by any other name may smell as sweet, but if you called it
an onion you'd get cooks very confused.          --RMS
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.orbitalfox.eu/archives/gemini/attachments/20201227/f93c
8296/attachment.htm>

---

Previous in thread (9 of 31): 🗣️ Johann Galle (johann (a) qwertqwefsday.eu)

Next in thread (11 of 31): 🗣️ Solderpunk (solderpunk (a) posteo.net)

View entire thread.