On Mon, Dec 7, 2020, at 18:47, colecmac at protonmail.com wrote: > > Yes, and that's unfortunate. But I think it makes sense for the > stability of Gemini > and the ease of programming to come first. I'm perplexed that "ease of programming" is considered more important than "ease of adoption." You mention that not every language supports the libraries needed for internationalized URLs. What does that lose the project vs. accessibility and broader adoption by non-English-speaking users for who Gemini would be a boon with limited bandwidth and hardware? I feel like I'm missing something with the emphasis on ease of client implementation over adoption. Emma Humphries gemini://gemini.djinn.party/
---
Previous in thread (3 of 32): 🗣️ John Cowan (cowan (a) ccil.org)
Next in thread (5 of 32): 🗣️ colecmac (a) protonmail.com (colecmac (a) protonmail.com)