Appetite for Gemini users mailing list?
- 🗣️ From: John Cowan (cowan (a) ccil.org)
- 📅 Sent: 2020-11-30 19:44
- 📧 Message 7 of 14
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 2:26 PM Solderpunk <solderpunk at posteo.net> wrote:
- gemini-spec: for spec finalisation. Ideally low traffic, limited
> membership, guaranteed in advance to be permanently set read-only
> within a few months of creation.
>
If you don't have an open(able) list, further spec errors similar to
the "gemini://" issue and schemelessness will never come to your
attention. It's one thing to have a feature freeze, but supposing there
will never be any errata is to ask too much of human spec writers. (I am
one, and I know.) Even RFCs are frozen in a purely textual sense, but they
can be superseded as a whole or in part, and there is an out-of-band formal
errata mechanism.
John Cowan http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan cowan at ccil.org
Clear? Huh! Why a four-year-old child could understand this report.
Run out and find me a four-year-old child. I can't make head or tail
out of it. --Rufus T. Firefly on government reports
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.orbitalfox.eu/archives/gemini/attachments/20201130/1360
38a8/attachment-0001.htm>
---
Previous in thread (6 of 14): 🗣️ Solderpunk (solderpunk (a) posteo.net)
Next in thread (8 of 14): 🗣️ sario528 (a) ctrl-c.club (sario528 (a) ctrl-c.club)
View entire thread.