Requiring schemes in Gemini requests

> I think I'm happy with this, does anybody object?

No, this is a great idea.  It's also been confusing a lot of people
(iirc) about what is a valid URL without a scheme (e.g. //example.com)
so making it absolutely clearly is a win.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.orbitalfox.eu/archives/gemini/attachments/20201127/9765
1335/attachment.sig>

---

Previous in thread (5 of 7): 🗣️ Solderpunk (solderpunk (a) posteo.net)

Next in thread (7 of 7): 🗣️ Sean Conner (sean (a) conman.org)

View entire thread.