On 14/11/20 17:07, smlckz at tilde.pink wrote: > For now, I am proposing the following metadata for inclusion in > documents (all of which is optional): > > * the date (and maybe time) when the document was published > > * the date (and maybe time) when the document was last modified > > * copyright information and/or license of the document I would also like a field for the source of the document. This will allow people to take local copies of documents without loosing track of where they came from and where updated versions may be found. It may also simplify mirroring sites too, especially given their is a field for the license information. I've had a dilemma about whether I should be placing the sites name at the top-level heading or elsewhere. If there were a location field, I would avoid placing the site's name at the top-most header, reclaiming another layer of heading depth in the process. Regardless of whether this becomes an official standard, I will probably adopt this or something like it because it makes so much sense. I would additionally like a field for the author and authors email address, but that's less important to me. I'm also proposing that these additional fields are optional. -- Jon
---
Previous in thread (8 of 27): 🗣️ smlckz (a) tilde.pink (smlckz (a) tilde.pink)
Next in thread (10 of 27): 🗣️ Sean Conner (sean (a) conman.org)