Caching and sizes, the explosion of responise codes (was Re: Caching and status codes)

It was thus said that the Great khuxkm at tilde.team once stated:
> 
> This can't happen, though, because the first proposal breaks the
> compatibility of <META> in response codes within a block, and the second
> one is just debating which of the codes we should add.

  This *did* happen, back on November 3rd.  

	gemini://gemi.dev/gemini-mailing-list/messages/003015.gmi

  And it's already received over a hundred hits.

> Cache/no-cache would be 2 (at most) response codes. That's all.

  And my argument, even with the size response code removed, can *still*
lead to a combinatoric explosion of response codes.  Today it's just *two*,
but what about tomorrow?

  -spc

---

Previous in thread (28 of 55): 🗣️ khuxkm (a) tilde.team (khuxkm (a) tilde.team)

Next in thread (30 of 55): 🗣️ Zach DeCook (zachdecook (a) librem.one)

View entire thread.