> I definitely have strong opinions about this, yeah - this would, like I > mentioned earlier, mean that my script returning a random photo wouldn't > work in your client, and that a lot of the tools and toys I was hoping to use > the gemini protocol for are probably suited for something else, > at least if the consensus among the gemini community is that arbitrary > caching is fine. I wouldn't worry about that if I were you -- I'm pretty sure I'm the only one on the planet dumb enough to cache like this :D There's a fair chance I'll change that stance when my browser is ready enough to be tested.
---
Previous in thread (5 of 55): 🗣️ bie (bie (a) 202x.moe)
Next in thread (7 of 55): 🗣️ Philip Linde (linde.philip (a) gmail.com)