Unadorned Gemtext instead of syndication formats

On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 07:54:12PM -0400, easeout at tilde.team wrote:

> I'm suggesting only a bare bones, dead simple, worse-is-better,
> get-what-you-can-with-what's-on-hand version of syndication. I would
> just collect all links on the page and not devise an intelligent way to
> filter them, as if we were scraping web pages for only the good stuff. I
> agree that would lead to divergent behavior among clients.

In hindsight I think I was unclear, so let me try to restate:

I would just collect every link on the page. I would not devise an
intelligent way to filter them. That would be like scraping web pages
with guesses and approximations, which we don't need to do. I would not
want clients to compete on differentiated Gemtext-subscribing behavior
when RSS / Atom are the right answer for an upgrade path.

---

Previous in thread (7 of 8): 🗣️ easeout (a) tilde.team (easeout (a) tilde.team)

View entire thread.