I agree 100% with Sean's post (http://boston.conman.org/2019/10/29.2) -- the act of posting something to a gemini *is* publishing, so it's out there -- toothpaste-tube-style. That being said, I think any archiver or spider should also respect *robots.txt* files -- though them being opt-in vs. opt-out is kind of moot, since spiders gonna spider, you know? It's the very nature of the Internet to communicate. However, I thought Dr. Otto brought up a vv good point as well: > Regardless, the issues being brought up here seem to circle around > content control and archival ethics and less about the protocol. Inasmuch as gemini is a technical specification/machine protocol, I think there's nothing to say about it vis-a-vis archiving. Socially, though, we have norms -- which are good to nail down in a nascent community. -- ~ acdw acdw.net | breadpunk.club/~breadw
---
Previous in thread (9 of 12): 🗣️ Dr. Otto Skrzyk (drskrzyk (a) tilde.team)
Next in thread (11 of 12): 🗣️ Brian Evans (b__m__e (a) mailfence.com)