Hopefully my announcement was not taken as a jab at the original torture tests. I have used your test suite extensively when building my client, and it made my life easier. If we can come up with a way to merge the two, I would love it. On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 12:53 AM Sean Conner <sean at conman.org> wrote: > > It was thus said that the Great Peter Vernigorov once stated: > > Pronounced egg-sam :) > > > > Building my client, I noticed that there were edge cases that I wanted > > to test but was not able to. > > You should have said something, I could have added most to my Gemini > Client Torture Test [1]. > > > Hopefully this is useful to others > > building clients as well. I broke up the spec into sections and tested > > each one individually. At the end you get a score! > > It's cool that there's very little overlap between our two test sets. > It's not cool that I seem to have been a bit slack in coming up with tests. > Sigh. > > I also like the organization scheme you came up with. > > -spc > > [1] gemini://gemini.conman.org/test/torture/
---
Previous in thread (4 of 6): 🗣️ solderpunk (solderpunk (a) SDF.ORG)
Next in thread (6 of 6): 🗣️ Sean Conner (sean (a) conman.org)