On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 4:50 PM solderpunk <solderpunk at sdf.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 11:53:19PM -0400, Michael Lazar wrote: > > > TLS_CLIENT_HASH > > > > I'm using a base64-encoded representation of the hash. I like your notation of > > SHA256:<HEX> better, but it's too late now and I don't want to break backwards > > compatibility. > > I am extremely interested in having a well-defined notion of > "certificate fingerprints" in Geminispace, not just for CGI apps but in > server configs too (Molly Brown will soon support being able to > configure lists of authorised certs for accessing certain directories). > It's a shame it's too late for you to make changes now, but for the sake > of all future implementations we should agree on something. Ok I'll walk that back. It's too late to make changes *unless* there's a good reason to do so. I don't want to break CGI variables on a whim anymore, but if we all agree on a standard then I will follow suit.
---
Previous in thread (26 of 52): 🗣️ solderpunk (solderpunk (a) SDF.ORG)
Next in thread (28 of 52): 🗣️ solderpunk (solderpunk (a) SDF.ORG)