> On Jun 4, 2020, at 18:31, James Tomasino <tomasino at lavabit.com> wrote: > > I think this idea, not the specific technical parts, but the theory and > philosophy, should answer all of the ideas you've been presenting > regarding URL hackery collectively in the negative. Fair enough. So, to summarize, standard URL hackery: big no-no, on philosophical grounds. But hacking your heart content by overloading the link description or otherwise randomly spraying text/gemini with obscure hieroglyphs? Ohhhhhh YES! ?? I foretell a schism ?? "When you come to a fork in the road, take it." -- Yogi Berra, allegedly -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.orbitalfox.eu/archives/gemini/attachments/20200604/0c49 1fc6/attachment.htm>
---
Previous in thread (4 of 6): 🗣️ James Tomasino (tomasino (a) lavabit.com)
Next in thread (6 of 6): 🗣️ Case Duckworth (acdw (a) acdw.net)