On 6/4/20 3:58 PM, Petite Abeille wrote: > On the server side, I presume? > > What happened to the notion of client's agency? > > 5.3.2 Link lines/Clients can present links to users in whatever fashion > the client author wishes./ The clients can present _links_ to users in whatever fashion. They should still be links. If a URL pattern allows for the encoding of random material, that should not be license to inline content. The goals of the project are clear philosophically that text/gemini represents a single document format that can hyperlink. Pulling in data in the ways you are describing is no different from the earlier suggestion of a <= line or frames. If your client wants to display images inline in the document AFTER a user clicks on a link, that would be within the purview of a client author. A client should not choose to inline images automatically, though, as they would no longer be links. I think this idea, not the specific technical parts, but the theory and philosophy, should answer all of the ideas you've been presenting regarding URL hackery collectively in the negative.
---
Previous in thread (3 of 6): 🗣️ Petite Abeille (petite.abeille (a) gmail.com)
Next in thread (5 of 6): 🗣️ Petite Abeille (petite.abeille (a) gmail.com)