Hmm this convention of using square bracket note-citations inline, followed by the URL. It seems nice and gemini-friendly. How widely used is that? Can it be "recommended" as a good practice if you want to do inline links? I'm thinking if it is a sufficiently established practice, clients can look for this pattern. And then when a suitably designed client if it sees this, could reverse the process to provide an inline clickable link, and then no need to duplicate the URL in the displayed content e.g. Source of "some text with a citation [1] more text etc => gemini://domain/path [1] next paragraph" is then simply rendered as "some text with a citation [1] more text etc next paragraph" and when rendered by the client, the "[1]" is an active element. Regards - Luke On 15-May-2020 23:41, Sean Conner wrote: > It was thus said that the Great Ben once stated: >> Or maybe Gemini should support in-line links of its own? It's already >> got some markdown elements in other aspects of page formatting. > As I said before, check the archives [1] for previous discussions. It > won't be hard to find them, as they make up about half the posts so far. > > -spc (It's a popular bike shedding topic ... ) > > [1] https://lists.orbitalfox.eu/archives/gemini/ >
---
Previous in thread (9 of 17): 🗣️ Brian Evans (b__m__e (a) mailfence.com)
Next in thread (11 of 17): 🗣️ Travis Briggs (audiodude (a) gmail.com)