On 1/18/20 6:34 PM, solderpunk wrote: > This was discussed previously in the following thread: > > gemini://gemi.dev/gemini-mailing-list/messages/000012.gmi > > Which I'm now going to re-read to remind myself of what was said. From > memory, I wasn't keen about adding extra fields to the META part of the > response header, for my usual fear of opening the gates to people adding > on weird non-standard extensions once it's established that more than > exactly one thing is allowed there. > > Interestingly, I somehow forgot about this ubiquitous fear of mine with > regards to the recent proliferation of text/gemini line types... Ah yes fogot about that thread! Basically Sean's proposal gemini://gemi.dev/gemini-mailing-list/messages/000045.gmi would satisfy all my needs client-wise, but if you prefer not to go this route that's fine too. Kind of a cherry on top of the cake!
---
Previous in thread (2 of 7): 🗣️ solderpunk (solderpunk (a) SDF.ORG)
Next in thread (4 of 7): 🗣️ Brian Evans (b__m__e (a) mailfence.com)