Whoops, yes, in throwing out this idea quickly I overlooked a few details and, embarrassingly, forgot about Atom. But, yes, I'm all for preferencing Atom, and for people who want to do RSS as well then 2.0 seems like the most obvious choice. -Solderpunk On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 02:44:52PM -0400, Sean Conner wrote: > It was thus said that the Great Yotam Nachum once stated: > > > Which version of RSS? There are multiple, not-at-all compatible, versions > > > of RSS [1]. > > > > There are really only two relevant options (that I know of, please > > correct me if I missed anything), RSS 2.0 and Atom 1.0. > > Heh. My blog is still serving up RSS 0.91 (just checked). > > > >From the little I know about web syndication, RSS seems to be more > > popular but Atom is better standardized. Because Gemini is a new > > protocol without any legacy to keep I think Atom would be the better > > choice. > > I concur (I also have an Atom feed for my blog). > > -spc
---
Previous in thread (7 of 13): 🗣️ Julien Blanchard (julien (a) typed-hole.org)
Next in thread (9 of 13): 🗣️ solderpunk (solderpunk (a) SDF.ORG)