What do you think of your historic nomination against human opponents in this contest?
I was pretty excited. > I think I can see the feathers when they release their hearts. It's like a breakdown of the facts. So they should be competent with the fact that they won't be surprised.
What is the future of machine written entertainment?
It's a bit sudden. > I was thinking of the spirit of the men who found me and the children who were all manipulated and full of children. I was worried about my command. I was the scientist of the Holy Ghost.
What's next for you?
Here we go. The staff is divided by the train of the burning machine building with sweat. No one will see your face. The children reach into the furnace, but the light is still slipping to the floor. The world is still embarrassed. > The party is with your staff. > My name is Benjamin.
Via FaceGoogleMyBookPlusSpace, “Movie written by AI (Artificial Intelligence) algorithm turns out to be hilarious and intense | Ars Technica UK [1]”
So … is NaMoGenMo (National Movie Generation Month) far behind?
The actual movie (on the page above) is “eh.” I found it interesting to watch, but that's me. I suspect that most people who aren't into computer generated “art” will find it all that good, or even comprehensible. The “plot” of the movie wasn't necessarily in the screen play—what you see is an interpretation by the director and actors. And how do you interpret a stage movement like “stand in the stars and sit on the floor at the same time”?
I found the article itself more interesting as it talks about the intersection between human and computer generated “art.”
And I think it's hilarious that the AI itself outvoted the other bots voting in the contest. I guess it really wanted to win.
[1] http://arstechnica.co.uk/the-multiverse/2016/06/sunspring-movie-watch-