Actually... maybe I’d rather not get involved.
James Edward Raggi IV kicked it off by saying I Don't Get It. Replies ranged from “Fuck that” ¹ to “Labels bad, freedom good. Mutually exclusive...” ² To me, labels seem to be an integral component of any rational discussion. Without generalizations and abstraction you’ll never be able to reason about anything beyond the most immediate of details.
I didn’t get it and wrote a long rant about it. Then I deleted it again. But now I can just quote other people:
Thank you, David Macauley, Joseph Browning, and all the other voices of reason.
Also, Rob Conley says “[The OSR] is a glorious mess and I wouldn’t have it any other way.” ¹⁰ — I agree! 😄
Interesting discussion here with Dan Proctor, Matt Finch, Rob Conley, Robert Fisher, Finarvyn, and many others chiming in: From The Desktop: My Final Stance on the OSR Debate by Rob Kuntz.
From The Desktop: My Final Stance on the OSR Debate
#Rhetoric #Reason
(Please contact me if you want to remove your comment.)
⁂
Beautiful; Loved the quotations method.
I looked at the conversation before reading your post, and agreed completely.
I think there’s a point of maturity a person reaches, when they realize that labels happen.
– LionKimbro 2010-07-16 21:34 UTC
---
Thanks. I appreciate your comment regarding the method in particular. Always good to get feedback on that. 😄
I still haven’t tagged the page “RPG” for fear of it showing up on blog rolls and aggregators and taking some flak. At the same time I feel disingenuous. What a stupid situation to be in. I feel as if I were afraid of owning my words. Maybe I should post something about that on CommunityWiki. If only I knew what it meant.
– Alex Schroeder 2010-07-16 22:29 UTC