I like Writeboard’s scope (sharing single pages of text on the web, no markup, diff, private or public) and design (small, elegant).
Like very very simple one-page wikis, private or public at your discretion. But I like their FAQ:
Aaaargh! The verdict has been spoken.
They /do/ use formatting rules. 🙂
It is interesting to note that both services provide text-editing for free. I really think this kind of thing should push MS Word over the edge. I use MS Word at work practically every day for specifications. The entire /concept/ of Word documents sucks. (Note that MS Word in itself has gotten a lot better than it used to be ten years ago.) The concept sucks because it is unwieldy, complex, bizarre, byzantine, opaque, and confusing. The sad thing is that I often feel that most other people I know who don’t know anything but Word are much worse Word users than I am. And I don’t even like it!
Anyway. Compare Writeboard pricing with Writely:
I like how Writeboard doesn’t promise any new features.
I would like this to be FreeSoftware, and would totally hope that they would succeed by selling services alone.
Just to make sure there’s no misunderstanding. I don’t like it because it is somehow part of the “Web 2.0”. I don’t like it because it somehow uses AJAX (does it?). I like /simple design/. SimpleSoftwareDesign, actually...
I gave it a try. Check it out. The password is “alex”.
They offer a RSS feed…
I see that the feed is currently invalid: //pubDate must be an RFC-822 date// ⁵
On the other hand the UTF-8 decoding bug is probably mine. Damn. :/
#Web
(Please contact me if you want to remove your comment.)
⁂
The Secret Sauce of Writely on O’Reilly Radar says “If there’s a secret sauce to Writely, it’s this merciless focus on the user.”
– Alex Schroeder 2005-10-06 07:37 UTC